Tag Archives: Roger W. Smith

adjective versus proper noun

 

A question for the writer of the Jan. 23 Metro headline “Episcopalian bishop has a history with Trump”: Would you top a story with “Californian governor meets with first responders”? Or “Virginian senator celebrates reelection”? Like “Californian” and “Virginian,” “Episcopalian” is almost always a noun denoting a person — in this case, a member of the Episcopal Church.

To The Post’s credit, the [words in the title of the] article was correct: “the Episcopal bishop of Washington.”

— Maurice Fliess, letter to editor, The Washington Post, January 31 2025

 

*****************************************************

A distinction worth noting. And why do Republicans always refer to the DEMOCRAT party? They do it with a malign intent. To lessen (so they believe) by nomenclature the party’s stature.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

   January 31, 2025

a splendid sentence

 

 

“Schwartz’s poems, especially the later ones, are dated. They groan under a freight of leaden rhymes and — Schwartz had a capacious mind — showy philosophical and literary references, spillover from the overstocked pantry that was his mind.”

— Dwight Garner, “Delmore Schwartz’s Poems Are Like Salt Flicked on the World,” The New York Times, April 8, 2024

review of The Collected Poems of Delmore Schwartz, edited by Ben Mazer

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

  April 11, 2024

how to write; Exhibit C

 

Ben and Jerry’s – WSJ 3-19-2024

 

Posted here:

Ben & Jerry’s Owner Loses Its Taste for Ice Cream

Unilever plans to spin off its ice-cream business, which includes Magnum and Popsicle, and could consider a sale

By Saabira Chaudhuri

The Wall Street Journal

March 19, 2024

My business journalism instructor, Gilbert T. Sewall, was correct when he observed that the Wall Street Journal is notable for the excellence of its writing per se.

The best term I can come up with to describe this piece is limpid.

Everything is covered, succinctly. The facts have all been reported, are all there.

The business issues are made clear.

A layman (i.e., someone not in the business world) can enjoy this piece. Pithy phrases achieve this result:

Ben & Jerry’s owner Unilever has lost its taste for the business.

Ben & Jerry’s, once regarded by analysts as a jewel in Unilever’s crown, has turned into something of a thorn in its side.

Ben & Jerry’s hasn’t shied away from taking a stand on social causes.

Ice cream has been a tough business for … consumer-goods companies. …

Our high school English teacher taught us about topic sentences. Here we see embedded “topic sentences” that ensure that the reader does not get lost and gets the import of the piece.

 

posted by Roger W. Smith

   March 2024

how to write a book review

 

Exemplified by … MYSELF.

What I would say (advise) is: cover the content of the book, what it’s about, what should be noted.

And: give your reviewer’s opinion of the book and whether it (implicitly) is worth reading.

 

Roger W. Smith review of Arthur Henry bio – Dreiser Studies, winter 2005

 

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

March 2024

how to write; Exhibit B

 

‘Rare Six-Planet System Discovred in Milky Way’ – WSJ 11-29-2023

 

Posted here is the following article (text plus marvelous photos):

Rare Six-Planet Star System Discovered in Milky Way: Worlds orbiting a sun-like star 100 light-years from Earth could unlock secrets surrounding the formation of our solar system

By Aylin Woodward

The Wall Street Journal

November 29, 2023

https://www.wsj.com/science/space-astronomy/space-discovery-exoplanets-earth-f50ad103?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1

 

I have been studying writing all my life. I know a good writer (and good writing) when I see one.

Both the famous ones and writers whom I encounter in my daily reading.

Aylin Woodward is a science writer for The Wall Street Journal. Her work is superb.

 

“A family of six gaseous worlds circling like rhythmic dervishes around a sun-like star will soon help astronomers better understand how planetary systems like our own formed and evolved.

“This newly discovered system, about 100 light-years from Earth, is unusual because its planets orbit a bright host star in a pattern that appears unchanged since its birth at least 4 billion years ago, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature.”

This is a very effective lead. Note how in the first paragraph, in just once sentence, the whole article is “capsulized.” The scope and importance of the subject, the findings, are stated with admirable concision.

The rest of the piece speaks for itself. My high school English teacher would have given it an A+.

 

I know from experience how difficult it is to adhere to word limits and write a brief article which reads well and sustains reader interest, while getting all the facts in (no easy task) and making their significance clear. Often the latter involves quotes — in this case from experts whom the author, Ms. Woodward, interviewed. All the facts and quotes have to be blended in skillfully without interrupting the flow of the piece.

While never losing sight of the overall significance of the findings and their import, This is done by the writer adhering to principles of writing such as unity and coherence

All of the best writers — including novelists — do this: mix the general with the specific. facts (narration) with exposition.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

   November 30, 2023

Emerson on Montaigne

 

Emerson, ‘Montaigne; Or, The Skeptic’

 

I was eager to read Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay “Montaigne; Or, The Skeptic,” which was published in his Representative Men: Seven Lectures (1850). I was disappointed and had a similar experience in reading Emerson that I have discussed in an earlier post:

Non-Sequaciousness (Emerson; also Carlyle)

Non-Sequaciousness (Emerson; also Carlyle)

Among the objectives of my posts on this site is to discuss “bad writing” and why even purportedly good writers fail.

I am very interested in Montaigne. I wanted to know what Emerson had to say about him. On about the seventh or eighth page of the essay, I found what I was looking for.

I found it tough to wade through the long introduction, and I had to dig and “extract” the stuff that I was interested in and the ((to me) salient points from a mass of glowing verbiage.

In his essay on non-sequaciousness (published in 1900) , Patrick Dillon states

… Emerson is, of all modern writers, the least fitted to be relied on as a literary model. The sparks he emits and the shocks he causes are dazzling and exciting; and his ideas are brilliant as the cascade’s spray; but it will be admitted that the effect of such a writer, taken as a model £or literary novices, must be in the last degree disastrous. The youthful mind is vastly inclined to vagueness, and, like Milton’s spirits, “finds no end, in wandering mazes lost.” Whatever, then, tends to encourage this tendency, must be fatal to that ratiocination, which, says Cardinal Newman, “is the great principle of order in thinking, reducing chaos to harmony.

Try reading the first few pages or paragraphs of Emerson’s essay for yourself.

 

— posted by Roger W. Smith

  November 2023

an obliterated artwork … jejune writing

 

See my post:

an obliterated artwork … jejune writing

 

Roger W, Smith

   October 2023